Acquired nonobstructive urinary bladder diverticulum: a case report
© Yovchevski and Kostov; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 21 October 2008
Accepted: 09 January 2009
Published: 09 January 2009
Urinary bladder diverticula are frequently resulting from obstructions. Our literature review did not reveal any cases of acquired urinary bladder diverticulum caused by long-term transurethral catheterization.
We report a rare case of a nonobstructive big urinary bladder diverticulum developed after a long-term urethral catheterization in a 62-year old male diabetic patient with normal subvesical urinary tract. The diverticulum was demonstrated by ultrasonography. Its formation was associated with the decubital changes of the bladder wall when the Foley catheter stayed for a longer period.
Ultrasonographic examination of the urinary bladder is necessary to exclude such complication after a long-lasting catheterization as well as to maximally restrict the catheter's stay in the urinary bladder.
Bladder diverticula are herniations of the bladder mucosa and submucosa through bladder muscular wall. They often cause no symptoms and are incidentally discovered during examination for other reasons. But sometimes patients present with urinary tract infections caused by diverticula, especially when they are large and empty poorly. Stasis of urine within diverticula can also lead to stone formation or epithelial dysplasia . Acquired diverticula are frequently resulting from obstructions, and rarely from iatrogenic causes like surgical interventions. However, our literature review did not reveal any cases of acquired urinary bladder diverticulum caused by long-term catheterization. Transurethral catheterization of the urinary bladder is usually accompanied by other fast developing complications – urinary tract infections , epididymo-orchitis , hemorrhage  and perforation .
The purpose of our study is to report the case of a patient with acquired nonobstructive urinary bladder diverticulum which was diagnosed with power Doppler sonography on routine ultrasonographic examination. We also aim to highlight the potential role of ultrasonographic examination as a noninvasive diagnostic method for such problems of the lower urinary tract.
The long-term stay of the catheter may cause a damage of the uroepithelial layer not only of the urethra but also of the opposite bladder wall (the one located opposite to the tip of the catheter). This problem may relatively more often occur in diabetic patients without any symptoms and may reveal itself in a later period. In our patient the chronological examination of the clinical data showed a causal relationship between the catheterization and the appearance of the diverticulum. This is a rare late complication of the urethral catheterization, which necessitates an ultrasonographic examination of the lower urinary tract after the complete catheter removal. A thorough examination of the clinical indications for Foley catheter placement and its timely removal should be conducted. This is very important for patients with DM, who are prone to more frequent and serious complications resulting from the impaired sensitivity, which is caused by diabetic polyneuropathy. This leads to a pain absence at urinary bladder wall damages. We believe this to be the first recorded case of acquired nonobstructive urinary bladder diverticulum diagnosed via power Doppler sonography. Our case demonstrates that the development of ultrasonography has led to the possibility of a more precise evaluation of lower urinary tract. Bladder ultrasonography is a good first-line imaging method for discovering bladder diverticula because anteriorly and posteriorly placed diverticula may not be noticed when voiding cystourethrography is used as they are overshadowed by the contrast in the bladder.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
We thank the patient for his contribution to this case report.
- Melekos MD, Asbach HW, Barbalias GA: Vesical Diverticulum: Etiology, Diagnosis, Tumorigenesis and Treatment: Analysis of 74 cases. Urology. 1987, 15: 453-10.1016/0090-4295(87)90378-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin CM, Bookrajian EN: Bacteriuria prevention after indwelling urinary catheterization. Arch Intern Med. 1962, 110: 703-711.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perrouin-Verbe B, Labat JJ, Richard I, Mauduyt del la Greve I, Buzelin JM, Mathe JF: Clean intermittent catheterisation from the acute period in spinal cord injury patients. Long term evaluation of urethral and genital tolerance. Paraplegia. 1995, 33: 619-624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sklar DP, Diven B, Jones J: Incidence and magnitude of catheter-induced hematuria. Am J Emerg Med. 1986, 4: 14-16. 10.1016/0735-6757(86)90242-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- White SA, Thompson MM, Boyle JR, Bell PR: Extraperitoneal bladder perforation caused by an indwelling urinary catheter. Br J Surg. 1994, 81: 1212-10.1002/bjs.1800810844.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.