Open Access

Late presentation of a paranasal sinus glass foreign body: a case report

Cases Journal20092:6483

DOI: 10.1186/1757-1626-2-6483

Received: 8 March 2009

Accepted: 30 April 2009

Published: 29 May 2009

Abstract

Foreign bodies in the paranasal sinuses are rare and mostly related to maxillo-facial trauma. We treated a 47-year-old man with a late complication arising from a foreign body in the nasoethmoid sinus present for 16 years after a road traffic accident. Patients presenting with maxillo-facial injuries, especially those with lacerations due to glass or car wind-screen trauma should have thorough examination and appropriate imaging of the injury.

Case presentation

A 47-year-old Caucasian man presented with forehead swelling and puffiness around the eyes. The swelling had gradually increased over a period of two months. The patient had purulent nasal discharge and no visual symptoms. Sixteen years ago, he was involved in a road traffic accident in which he sustained a laceration on his forehead as he collided with the windscreen of the car. He attended his local accident and emergency department and the laceration was treated by primary suturing under local anaesthesia (LA). No Plain radiographs were carried out. The wound healed well and the patient had no problems.

On examination, a 5 cm linear scar was noted over the forehead swelling. The swelling measured 6 cm x 3 cm and was mildly tender. The patient underwent a complete ear nose throat examination. The nasal speculum examination showed sinusitis of the left paranasal sinuses which was confirmed by endoscopy. The CT (computed tomography) scan of paranasal sinuses (Figure 1) showed a radio-opaque foreign body (FB) in the left ethmoid sinus with opacification of all sinuses on the left side.
Figure 1

CT scan of the para nasal sinuses showing a left ethmoid sinus foreign body and opacification of all sinuses on the left.

The patient underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery with removal of glass fragment and draining of the sinuses. His symptoms resolved completely following the procedure. At 12 months follow-up, the patient has had no similar problems and remains asymptomatic.

Discussion

Seventy percent of FBs in the paranasal sinuses are associated with some form of maxillofacial trauma [1, 2]. If not suspected, they may escape detection during initial examination [3]. Fifty percent of such FBs are found in the maxillary sinus. They can also be found in other para-nasal sinuses and the reported incidence is equal [4]. Glass and metal fragments are the commonest forms of FBs seen within the para-nasal sinuses [5, 6]. Although glass is inert, it can cause recurrent infection or obstruction of the frontonasal duct [7].

In the case reported, the patient presented with purulent left para-nasal sinusitis due to obstruction of the left frontonasal duct caused by an undetected glass fragment 16 years following the injury. To the best of our knowledge, such a late presentation of this complication has not been reported in the literature.

Patients with maxillo-facial injuries due to glass or car wind-screen trauma should have thorough examination of the wound. Simple lacerations can be inspected under LA but complicated injuries with deep maxillo-facial lacerations should have a wound inspection in the operating theatre.

Plain radiographs are useful to detect FBs [3]. Axial CT is the examination of choice for a suspected sinus FB. CT is helpful in localising the foreign body accurately, assesses the integrity of the anterior and posterior frontal sinus wall, the condition of mucosa, intracranial penetration and possible complications [2]. Endoscopic sinus surgery for removal of sinus FBs is effective and avoids the need for an external ethmoidectomy [4].

Conclusion

This case illustrates that a high index of suspicion of a FB should be maintained in a patient with maxillo-facial trauma. A careful examination of the wound and appropriate imaging may help avoid future complications.

Author's contributions

JM wrote the draft of the manuscript, performed the literature search. APS was involved in the care of the patient. APS supervised and finalised the manuscript.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CT: 

computed tomography

LA: 

local anaesthesia

FB: 

foreign body.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Colchester General Hospital
(2)
ENT Department, Basildon Hospital

References

  1. Grevers G, Reiterer A: Traumatisch bedingte Fremdkorper der Nasennebenhohlen. Laringorhinootologie. 1990, 69: 155-157. 10.1055/s-2007-998164.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Onerci M, Ogrentmenoglu O, Yilmaz T: Glass in the frontal sinus: report of three cases. J Laryngol Otol. 1997, 111: 156-158. 10.1017/S0022215100136710.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yilzmaz M, Top H, Ulvtas K: Glass in nasoethmoid, maxillary and orbital area as a result of windshield trauma. Ann Plast Surg. 2000, 44: 684-686. 10.1097/00000637-200044060-00030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Murthy PSN, et al: Foreign body in ethmoid sinus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994, 23: 74-75. 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80595-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Graces SM, Norris CW: Unusual frontal sinus foreign body. J Laryngol Otol. 1972, 86: 1265-1268.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Vishwambara NP: A case of foreign body in the frontal sinus. J Laryngol Otol. 1971, 85: 511-514.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Payne RF: Foreign bodies in the frontal sinus. British Journal of Radiology. 1967, 40: 778-780. 10.1259/0007-1285-40-478-778.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.