Curing tinnitus with a Cochlear Implant in a patient with unilateral sudden deafness: a case report
© licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 13 November 2008
Accepted: 20 March 2009
Published: 18 May 2009
Cochlear implantation is a routine procedure for patients with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss. Some reports demonstrated a suppression of tinnitus as a side-effect after implantation. We describe the case of a 55-year-old man suffering from severe right-sided tinnitus in consequence of sudden right-sided deafness. Multiple therapeutic efforts including intravenous steroids and tympanoscopy with grafting of the round window remained unsuccessful. One year after onset of symptoms right-sided cochlear implantation was performed, which resulted in a complete abolishment of tinnitus after activating the implant. Severe unilateral tinnitus after sudden deafness might represent a new indication for cochlear implantation.
Tinnitus is a frequent and often debilitating condition, which is difficult to treat. The most frequently used therapies consist of auditory stimulation and cognitive behavioural treatment aiming at improving habituation and coping strategies. However, more causally oriented therapeutic strategies are lacking and need to be developed to relieve auditory perception disturbances.
Even if the pathophysiology of tinnitus remains incompletely understood there is increasing evidence that tinnitus is related to alterations of neuronal functioning in the central auditory system. Similar like in phantom limb pain, tinnitus as an auditory phantom perception seems to be the correlate of maladaptive attempts of the brain at reorganization due to distorted sensory input. This notion is confirmed by the finding that hearing loss is the most important risk factor for developing tinnitus and that most people with sudden unilateral deafness experience tinnitus. Animal experiments have demonstrated that reduced auditory input causes a dysbalance between inhibitory and facilitatory mechanisms throughout the central auditory pathways, which then results in reorganisation of the tonotopic maps in the auditory cortex. This might represent a neuronal correlate of tinnitus . Accordingly therapeutic strategies that either specifically compensate for hearing loss or normalize auditory input (e.g. hearing aids) have been shown consistently to attenuate tinnitus complaints .
Subjects with severe to profound hearing impairment on both ears are considered as good candidates for cochlear implant (CI) surgery. For post-lingual deaf adults a cochlear implant can be a great help in restoring functional comprehension of speech. The prevalence of tinnitus in adult patients, that undergo cochlear implantation for the classical indication of hearing restoration, ranges between 67 and 100% . Improvement of tinnitus complaints after implantation has been reported in many studies . But also worsening of a pre-existing tinnitus or new development of tinnitus after electrode insertion has been described . However documentation and definition of tinnitus complaints in CI patients are often not standardized and therefore difficult to compare to results obtained from classical tinnitus therapies.
Despite extensive research efforts the precise pathogenesis of sudden unilateral deafness remains unclear. Especially in cases with persistent hearing loss patients frequently complain of tinnitus . Here we present the case of a patient with unilateral disabling tinnitus as a consequence of sudden deafness, who was treated successfully with cochlear implantation.
Tinnitus assessment before and after cochlear implantation
TQ-score* (Goebel, 1994)
VAS loudness (0-10)
VAS Annoyance (0-10)
1 month post-operative
3 months post-operative
The deaf right ear was successfully implanted with a MedEL SONATAti 100 Cochlear Implant (MedEL, Innsbruck, Austria). Post-operative X-Ray revealed a correct position of the electrode in relation to the basal turn of the cochlea. Shortly after activation of the cochlear implant in the context of a standard fitting procedure the patient reported a reduction of his tinnitus, which completely disappeared during electrical stimulation within the following 3 months. With a deactivated implant the tinnitus only reoccurred after presentation to loud noise. The clinical improvement was also reflected by a distinct decrease in the scores of the questionnaires and the VAS (Table 1). Speech reception of monosyllables at 65 dB SPL improved from 0% preoperatively to 60% 3 months after first fitting and the patient reported no conflict of hearing between the implanted and the contralateral ear.
This case report demonstrates complete tinnitus suppression as a consequence of cochlear implantation in a patient with unilateral sudden deafness. The application of cochlear implants for tinnitus relief in patients with unilateral deafness has so far only been described in one study . All 21 patients included in that study had unilateral sensorineural hearing loss accompanied by severe tinnitus for at least two years. In 95% of patients beneficial effects could be demonstrated. Three patients showed complete tinnitus relief like our patient did, whereas the majority demonstrated statistically significant improvement on tinnitus loudness and impact.
According to different pathologic changes that generate neural activity interpreted as tinnitus, there are several possible mechanisms which may account for tinnitus suppression after cochlear implantation. Our report further supports the model of tinnitus pathophysiology, in which chronic tinnitus as an auditory phantom perception might be the correlate of maladaptive attempts at cortical reorganization due to peripheral deafferentation . As a consequence of this theory, restoration of peripheral sensory input may have long-term beneficial effects on tinnitus by plastic reorganization of the central auditory nervous system. Such a mechanism might be reflected by the observed time course in our patient where tinnitus improved over a period of about three months after implantation. Another possible explanation for the positive effect might be the masking of tinnitus following increased auditory information due to the cochlear implant. Residual inhibition might explain tinnitus suppression effects which outlast the active stimulation period for a certain amount of time. But our observation that tinnitus was neither perceived in quiet environments nor during sleep might not entirely account for this theory. The effect of the insertion of the electrode into the cochlear should also be discussed . Cochlear implantation causes immediate and subsequent trauma to remaining cochlear structures. This might be of benefit in patients, in which abnormal activity of hair cells turns out to be a constant trigger mechanism for tinnitus. However, in these patients immediate postoperative effects due to destruction should be expected, which might occur independent from activation of the implant system.
Summarizing, disabling tinnitus resulting from sudden unilateral deafness should be considered as a new indication for a cochlear implant procedure. As demonstrated in this report and supported by literature data cochlear implantation may represent a chance for complete suppression of tinnitus in selected patients.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
List of abbreviations
Magnetic resonance imaging
Sound pressure level
Visual Analogue Scale.
- Eggermont JJ: Pathophysiology of tinnitus. Prog Brain Res. 2007, 166: 19-35. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Del Bo L, Ambrosetti U: Hearing aids for the treatment of tinnitus. Prog Brain Res. 2007, 166: 341-345. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baguley DM, Atlas MD: Cochlear implants and tinnitus. Prog Brain Res. 2007, 166: 347-355. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyamoto RT, Bichey B: Cochlear implants for suppression of tinnitus. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2003, 36: 345-352. 10.1016/S0030-6665(02)00165-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tyler RS: Advantages and disadvantages expected and reported by cochlear implant patients. Am J Otol. 1994, 15: 523-531. 10.1016/j.anl.2007.04.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishida IM, Sugiura M, Naganawa S, Teranishi M, Nakashima T: Otoacoustic emissions, ear fullness and tinnitus in the recovery course of sudden deafness. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2008, 35: 41-46. 10.1016/j.anl.2007.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goebel G, Hiller W: The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire (TF). HNO. 1994, 42: 166-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB: Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996, 122: 143-148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D: Incapacitating, unilateral tinnitus in single sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008, 117: 645-652.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moller AR: Pathophysiology of tinnitus. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2003, 36: 249-266. 10.1016/S0030-6665(02)00170-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.