Humeral biepicondylar fracture dislocation in a child: A case report and review of the literature
© Ul Gani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 18 August 2008
Accepted: 19 September 2008
Published: 19 September 2008
Humeral biepicondylar fracture dislocation is a very rare injury reported only once in English literature by G R Taylor et al. We report a case of humeral biepicondylar fracture dislocation in a 13-year-old girl with a unique mechanism of injury.
A 13-year-old girl presented with trauma elbow. Radiographs showed biepicondylar fracture of humerus with dislocation of elbow.
In humeral biepicondylar fracture dislocation, reduction is always unstable. So treatment is open reduction and internal fixation.
The elbow is a common site of injury in children . Medial epicondyle fracture of humerus is third most common pediatric elbow fracture(behind supracondylar & lateral condyle fracture) occurring mostly in age group 9–14 years. Fracture of the medial epicondyle is usually caused by a valgus stress producing traction on flexor pronator tendon and subsequently on the medial epicondyle itself. The valgus stress may be produced by a fall on out stretched hand or by a fall on elbow . In children avulsion of the medial epicondyle is commonly associated with posterolateral elbow dislocation due to tight attachment of the ulnar collateral ligament both to medial epicondyle and ulna. Avulsion of the lateral epicondyle is rare and may be overlooked due to its late and unusual pattern of ossification . Fracture lateral epicondyle is usually caused by a severe varus force applied to the elbow or a sudden severe tension in the extensor group of forearm muscles or it may also result from a fall on the outstretched hand, driving the head of the radius against the capitellum and displacing it together with the epiphysis and part of metaphysis. Humeral biepicondylar fracture dislocation is a very rare injury reported only once in English literature by G R Taylor et al . We report a case of humeral biepicondylar fracture dislocation in a 13-year-old girl with a unique mechanism of injury.
There is limited evidence available in the literature describing complex humeral biepicondylar fracture dislocation in children. The complex elbow anatomy and multiple growth centers appearing at different time periods complicate the diagnosis and management of such injuries. Mechanism of injury in such a complex fracture dislocation remains to be resolved.
Lateral epicondylar fracture can result from a severe varus force applied to the elbow or due to severe sudden tension in the extensor muscles of forearm. A fracture may also result from a fall on outstretched hand, driving the radial head against capitellum and displacing it together with the epiphysis and part of the maphysis. Fracture of the medial epicondyle is usually caused by the valgus stress producing traction on flexor pronator tendon. Valgus stress may be produced by a fall on the outstretched hand or by a fall on the elbow.
It is likely that in this child who was sitting with her right outstretched hand supporting her body, samawar fell on her extended elbow causing direct impact to the lateral epicondyle leading to its fracture and simultaneously producing a vulgus stress at elbow leading to fracture of medial epicondyle and dislocation of elbow.
Another possibility is that the samawar fell on extended elbow of the child who was sitting with her right outstretched hand supporting her body, producing a valgus stress at the elbow and simultaneously driving the radial head against the capitellum and fracturing it together with the lateral epicondyle.
It is also possible that in this child who was sitting with her right outstretched hand supporting her body, Samawar fell on her extended elbow producing a valgus stress at elbow and simultaneously causing internal rotation and medial displacement of humerus over the fixed hand leading to epiphysial traction injury on both sides.
This injury would account for gross instability of elbow. In our case open reduction and internal fixation of both fractures restored elbow stability. Patient had regained full range of movement by 5 months. Though there is very little literature available on this injury, we believe that closed reduction and conservative management will lead to a grossly unstable and easily dislocatable elbow. So we agree with Taylor , who recommended open anatomical reduction to ensure restoration of elbow stability. We also agree with Taylor  that this injury may be missed in a young child as the lateral epiphysis ossifies in the second decade, though this was not seen in our case as the child was of 13 years age.
This injury would account for gross instability of elbow, so open reduction and internal fixation is recommended to restore elbow stability.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's guardian for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Joseph WCH, Lee FR, Harvey W, Mihvan OT: Injuries of the medial epicondylar ossification center of the hemerus. Am J Roentgenol. 1977, 129: 49-55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taylor GR, Gent E, Clarke NM: Biepicondylar fracture dislocation of a child's elbow. Injury. 1997, 28 (1): 71-2. 10.1016/S0020-1383(96)00138-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silberstein MJ, Brodeur AE, Graviss ER: Some vagaries of the lateral epicondyle. JBJS Am. 1982, 64: 444-448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.