- Case Report
- Open Access
Benign retropneumoperitoneum developed after endoscopic sphincterotomy and large balloon dilation of biliary sphincter for removal of large biliary stones: a case report
© Katsinelos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 08 October 2008
- Accepted: 28 October 2008
- Published: 28 October 2008
Biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) followed by biliary orifice dilation (BOD) with large-diameter balloons (> 12 mm) is a relative new technique for extraction of large biliary stones. However, the safety and the potential complications of this combined technique are not known yet. We present a patient who developed benign retroperitoneum after ES plus BOD with large-diameter balloon for removal of a large biliary stone, which was successfully treated conservatively. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of such a complication after introduction of this method to clinical practice.
- Common Bile Duct
- Balloon Dilation
- Bile Duct Stone
- Endoscopic Sphincterotomy
- Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation
Biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction are considered as a standard therapy for treatment of biliary duct stones [1, 2]. However, removal of large bile duct stones can be challenging in certain situations, such as after gastric bypass surgery or in the presence of periampullary diverticulum, stones located centrally to strictures and impacted stones [3, 4]. The introduction by Ersoz et al  of ES followed by biliary orifice dilation (BOD) with large-diameter balloons (> 12 mm) for extraction of large biliary stones was rapidly adopted with enthusiasm by other biliary endoscopists [3, 6, 7]. However, the safety and the potential complications of this new combined technique are not known yet.
We present a patient who developed benign retroperitoneum after ES plus BOD with large-diameter balloon (12 mm in diameter) for removal of a large biliary stone. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of such a complication after introduction of this method to clinical practice.
ES with a large incision may be effective for extraction of large or difficult CBD stones; however, a large incision has a higher risk of perforation and probably a higher risk of bleeding [8, 9]. Silent retroperitoneal air is not uncommon after ES and manipulation of papillary area [9–11]. Most of the symptomatic patients with retroperitoneal air are treated conservatively, but the risk of severe complications still exists [9–11]. Persistent abdominal pain and systemic toxic signs with leucocytosis should alert the management team, because continuous retroperitoneal leak of bile or duodenal juice leads to catastrophic results. Early surgical intervention, with extensive exploration, drainage and closure of the perforation, is generally indicated once severe retroperitoneal perforation is suspected [9–11].
To overcome the limitations of ES with large incision and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (high rate of post-procedure pancreatitis and frequent use of mechanical lithotripsy), BOS after small or moderate ES has been advised as an effective method for retrieving large biliary stones without the use of mechanical lithotripsy [3, 6, 7].
Patients in whom bile duct stones cannot be removed because of a tapered distal bile duct and patients with large, square or barrel-shaped stones would benefit from this procedure.
The most common complications of this procedure are mild cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. Complications occurred in 15.5% of patients in one study , with most of them (10.3%) being mild and self-limited. Moderately severe bleeding due to ES developed in three patients (5.2%), all of whom recovered without the need for surgery. Perforation did not occur in any patient who underwent dilation with a large diameter balloon. Mild pancreatitis developed in two patients (3.4%). Theoretically, the risk of pancreatitis by large balloon dilation after minimal or moderate sphincterotomy is less than balloon dilation alone. It is probable that after ES the force exerted by balloon dilation is directed mostly toward the common bile duct than the pancreatic orifice. Minimal or moderate ES before large balloon dilation might decrease the risk of pancreatitis as compared to dilation alone.
Overt perforations at the level of the major papilla after combined ES plus BOD have been rarely reported [3, 6, 7], suggesting that initial sphincterotomy incision followed by the stretching and tearing effect of the forcible dilation is a safe way to provide the maximum exit for stones even when balloons of up to 18 mm are used. Endoscopic papillary dilation should be performed slowly with a large balloon (maximum of 20 mm in diameter) to match the size of the bile duct. The use of balloons having diameter larger than common bile duct size can lead to increased incidence of perforation. Approximately 1 minute of balloon dilation is considered sufficient. We believe that patients with distal CBD stenosis, a narrow CBD or non-visible intramural course of CBD are at risk of perforation after balloon dilation. Therefore, it seems prudent to avoid excessive dilation in patients with these characteristics.
The presence of air in the retroperitoneum is not always a detrimental complication of ES plus BOD and can be successfully treated conservatively in selected cases.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Lauri A, Horton RC, Davidson BR, Burroughs AK, Dooley JS: Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones: management related to stone size. Gut. 1993, 34: 1718-1721. 10.1136/gut.34.12.1718.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cotton PB, Geenen JE, Sherman S, Cunningham JT, Howell DA, Carr-Locke DL, Nickl NJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GA, Ferrari A, Slivka A, Lichtenstein DR, Baillie J, Jowell PS, Lail LM, Evangelou H, Bosco JJ, Hanson BL, Hoffman BJ, Rahaman SM, Male R: Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe even in younger patients with normal ducts. Ann Surg. 1998, 227: 201-204. 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toda N, Saito K, Wada R, Kawabe T, Shiratori Y, Mitsushima T, Omata M: Endoscopic sphincterotomy and papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005, 52: 700-704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bergman JJ, Van Berkel AM, Bruno MJ, Fockens P, Rauws EA, Tijssen JG, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K: A randomized trial of endoscopic balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones in patients with a prior Billroth II gastrectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001, 53: 19-26. 10.1067/mge.2001.110454.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO, Gunsar F: Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003, 57: 156-159. 10.1067/mge.2003.52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hwang SJ, Kim YG, Lee KC: Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic large balloon dilatation for large bile duct stones. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2006, 32: 181-189.Google Scholar
- Minami A, Nomoto T, Moriyama T: Small sphincterotomy combined papillary dilatation with large balloon lithotripsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005, 61.Google Scholar
- Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM: Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996, 335: 909-918. 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, Minoli G, Crosta C, Comin U, Fertitta A, Prada A, Passoni GR, Testoni PA: Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96: 417-423. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03594.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Genzlinger JL, McPhee MS, Fisher JK, Jacob KM, Helzberg JH: Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94: 1267-1270. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00996.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zissin R, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Oscadchy A, Pomeranz I, Leichtmann G, Novis B: Retroperitoneal perforation during endoscopic sphincterotomy: imaging finding. Abdom Imaging. 2000, 25: 279-282. 10.1007/s002610000033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chung RS, Sivak MV, Ferguson DR: Surgical decisions in the management of duodenal perforation complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am J Surg. 1993, 165: 700-703. 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80791-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.