- Case Report
- Open Access
Enterocutaneous fistula due to mesh fixation in the repair of lateral incisional hernia: a case report
© Sistla et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 11 November 2008
Accepted: 02 December 2008
Published: 02 December 2008
Enterocutaneous fistula following mesh repair of incisional hernia is usually due to mesh erosion of the underlying viscus and presents late. We describe an early enterocutaneous fistula due to an unusual but a potential mode of bowel injury during mesh fixation. This case is reported to emphasize the need for greater attention to the technique of mesh fixation. We suggest laparoscopic guidance to prevent this serious complication in lateral Incisional hernias with ill defined edges of the defect.
Enterocutaneous fistula is a late complication of mesh repair of incisional hernia and is usually due to erosion of intestines by the mesh. Early development of enterocutaneous fistula is usually due to inadvertent and unrecognized enterotomy during separation of adhesions. We present our experience with an enterocutaneous fistula due to anchoring stitch resulting in bowel injury during mesh fixation in an onlay repair of a lateral Incisional hernia. Ill defined edges of the hernial defect and bowel adherent to the sac were the cause of this complication. A simple technical solution to avoid this serious complication is suggested.
Repair of incisional hernia is done by either suture repair or prosthetic mesh repair. The latter is associated with a lower recurrence rate but a higher incidence of complications. The most serious complication though fortunately rare, is the development of enterocutaneous fistula [1, 2].
Enterocutaneous fistula is a late complication of prosthetic mesh repair of incisional hernia and is usually due to chronic erosion of bowel by mesh placed in direct contact with intestinal loops both in open and laparoscopic repairs [3–5].
Unrecognized bowel injury during release of adhesions and thermal or trocar injuries to bowel in laparoscopic repair can also result in fistula. Basoglu emphasized the need for peritoneal or omentum coverage for prevention of bowel contact with mesh .
The incidence of enterocutaneous fistula due to prosthetic mesh is higher in subfascial (5.2%) than in onlay (2.6%) position . In the present case, the patient did not have any symptoms of intestinal obstruction the hernial sac was not opened and it was preserved. Preserving the hernia sac provides a layer of viable autogenous tissue to serve as a barrier between the prosthesis and the intraperitoneal contents, possibly decreasing the risk of adhesions, intestinal obstruction and fistula .
The technique described by Khaira et al provides an additional barrier of rectus sheath or aponeurosis between the mesh and the hernial sac and also reduces the risk of bowel injury during mesh fixation . This risk is greater in lateral (transverse or oblique) incisional herniae where the edges of the defect are not as well defined as in midline herniae.
In our case the anchoring suture had injured the bowel which was adherent to the sac. The resultant fistula was well localized with no contamination of the peritoneal cavity. The discharge was not feculent as it involved a very small part of the circumference of the bowel. Enterocutaneous fistula in this case was diagnosed by contrast study. A similar case of enterocutaneous fistula was reported by Acar et al .
This case is reported to illustrate the potential risk of bowel injury during mesh fixation in onlay mesh repair, especially in lateral incisional herniae with ill defined edges of the hernial defect. The hernial sac need not be opened routinely in the absence of symptoms of obstruction. Separation of asymptomatic adhesions only increases the risk of bowel injury. We suggest anchoring the mesh under laparoscopic guidance with a 5 mm telescope away from the site of repair. The edges of the defect can be better defined by laparoscopy thereby helping in placing the mesh beyond the defect. Laparoscopic guidance can also prevent accidental injury to bowel during mesh fixation. This also obviates the need for an expensive dual mesh used in laparoscopic repairs.
Informed consent of the patient was obtained for publication of this case report. The pictures in this manuscript do not reveal the identity of the patient
- Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J: Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture versus Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia. Ann Surg. 2004, 240 (4): 578-585.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP: Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg. 1998, 133 (4): 378-82. 10.1001/archsurg.133.4.378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seelig MH, Kasperk R, Tietze L, Schumpelick V: Chirurg. 1995, 66 (7): 739-741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chew DK, Choi LH, Rogers AM: Enterocutaneous fistula 14 years after prosthetic mesh repair of a ventral incisional hernia: a life-long risk?. Surgery. 2000, 127 (3): 352-3. 10.1067/msy.2000.100886.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller k, Junger W: Ileocutaneous fistula formationfollowing laparoscopic polypropylene mesh hernia repair. Surgical endoscopy. 1997, 11 (7): 772-773. 10.1007/s004649900448.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basoglu M, Yildirgan MI, Yilmaz I, Balik A, Celebi F, Atamanalp SS, Polat KY, Oren D: Late Complications of Incisional Hernias Following Prosthetic Mesh Repair). Acta chir belg. 2004, 104: 425-428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Acar T, Gömceli I, Taçyildiz R, Sözen S, Karakayali S, Aydin R: Enterocutaneous fistula due to polypropylene mesh Migration. Irish Journal of Medical Science. 171 (3).Google Scholar
- Morris-Stiff GJ, Hughes LE: The outcomes of nonabsorbable Mesh placed within the abdominal cavity: literature review and clinical experience. J Am Coll Surg. 1998, 186: 352-67. 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00002-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khaira Hs, Lall P, Hunter B, Brown JH: Repair of incisional hernias. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001, 46: 39-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.