Foreign body reaction to bone wax an unusual cause of persistent serous discharge from iliac crest graft donor site and the possible means to avoid such complication - a case report
© Qayum and Koka; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 2 October 2009
Accepted: 27 November 2009
Published: 27 November 2009
Bone wax is sometimes used in a variety of surgical procedures as a haemostatic. Bone wax contains beeswax softened with isopropyl palmitate or paraffin. It is nonabsorbable with no biochemical action. It achieves haemostasis by occluding the blood channels mechanically. Once applied it essentially never goes away. Bone wax reactions have been reported in literature many times.
We report a case in which bone wax was used to control bleeding at the iliac crest from which bone graft was harvested. The foreign body reaction to bone wax caused persistent discharge from iliac crest graft donor site.
Bone wax is a foreign body and that there is always a possibility of foreign body granulomas following its use. When necessary, bone wax should be used just for the time needed to achieve hemostasis. If it is left in place, care should be taken to avoid bone wax accumulation in the bony craters formed during surgery. Applying bone wax as a smooth layer may lead to this lumpy formation in the bony craters and one should be careful about it.
A 43 year old female patient of Indian origin came to our hospital with nonunion fracture shaft of right humerus. She was treated elsewhere with closed reduction and U-slab for her fracture initially. Her fracture showed no signs of union even after 8 weeks of conservative treatment. Open reduction and internal fixation with narrow dynamic compression plate with cancellous bone grafting was done. Graft was taken from iliac crest right side.
She was discharged from the hospital 4th day post surgery after inspecting her wound sites which were healthy. Suture removal was done on 11th day.
Bone wax was developed by Horsley in1886 . It contains beeswax softened with isopropyl palmitate or paraffin. It is used in many surgical procedures to control bleeding. It is nonabsorbable with no biochemical action. It achieves hemostasis by occluding the blood channels mechanically . Once applied it essentially never goes away. Surgeon should be aware of the adverse effects of its use. It is known to interfere with bone healing and osteogenesis. It has been shown to reduce bacterial clearance in cancellous bone and to increase the risk of infection. In the presence of bone wax, the number of bacteria needed to produce osteomyelitis is reduced by a factor of 104 (10,000) .
Foreign-body granulomatous reaction due to bone wax has been reported in various surgical sites with different clinical implications, requiring surgical exploration in some cases. Bone wax granulomas have been reported in mastoid , sternototomy site, lumbar disc surgical site , at the cerebellopontine angle , in the subarachnoid space near medulla oblongata, in femoral neck osteoplasty site , in orbits, in cranial defects, after tibial tubercle elevation surgery and after foot surgery. In one instance, in which bone wax had been used to stop bleeding from the iliac crest after the harvesting of autogenous graft, the patient presented 19 years later with a large, symptomatic, retroperitoneal tumour associated with a foreign-body reaction, which had to be removed operatively .
Though inexpensive, easy to use with immediate effect on bleeding, bone wax should be used with caution after weighing the potential complications against the benefits. Bone wax is a foreign body and that there is always a possibility of foreign body granulomas following its use.
When necessary, bone wax should be used just for the time needed to achieve hemostasis. If it is left in place, care should be taken to avoid bone wax accumulation in the bony craters formed during surgery. Applying bone wax as a smooth layer by pasting with finger may lead to its lumpy formation in the bony craters and one should be careful about it.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Lavigne M, Reddi Boddu Siva KR, Doyon J, Vendittoli P-A: Bone-wax granuloma after femoral neck osteoplasty. Can J Surg. 2008, 51 (3): E58-E60.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nelson DR, Buxton TB, Luu QN, Rissing JP: The promotional effect of bone wax on experimental Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990, 99: 977-980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Low WK, Sim CS: Bone Wax Foreign Body Granuloma in the Mastoid. ORL. 2002, 64: 38-40. 10.1159/000049267.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eser Olcay, Cosar Murat, Aslan Adem, Sahin Onder: Bone wax as a cause of foreign body reaction after lumbar disc surgery: A case report. Advances in Therapy. 2007, 24 (3): 10.1007/BF02848783.Google Scholar
- Patel RB, Kwartler JA, Hodosh R: Bone wax as a cause of foreign body granuloma in cerebellopontine angle. J Neurosurg. 2000, 92: 362-10.3171/jns.2000.92.2.0362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verborgt O, Verellen K, Van Thielen F, Deroover M, Verbist L, Borms T: A retroperitoneal tumor as a late complication of the use of bone wax. Acta Orthop Belg. 2000, 66: 389-91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.