Acute presentation of a heterotopic pregnancy following spontaneous conception: a case report
© Umranikar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 6 November 2009
Accepted: 21 December 2009
Published: 21 December 2009
Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy is a rare clinical condition in which intrauterine and extra uterine pregnancies occur at the same time. It can be a life threatening condition and can be easily missed with the diagnosis being overlooked. We present the case of a 40 year old patient who was treated for a heterotopic pregnancy. She had a transvaginal ultrasound because of a previous ectopic pregnancy and an intrauterine gestational sac was seen with false reassurances. The patient presented acutely with a ruptured tubal pregnancy and this was managed laparoscopically. The ectopic pregnancy was not suspected at her initial presentation. A high index of suspicion is needed in women with risk factors for an ectopic pregnancy and in low risk women who have free fluid with or without an adnexal mass with an intrauterine gestation.
A 40-year-old Caucasian lady of UK origin was seen in our Early Pregnancy Unit at 8 weeks gestation to confirm site of pregnancy as she had a previous ectopic pregnancy. This was a spontaneous conception with no previous fertility treatment. She did not use any contraception in the interim.
Three years earlier she was diagnosed with a right tubal ectopic pregnancy which was treated by a laparoscopic salpingectomy. Prior to that she had two normal pregnancies and deliveries. She did not have any risk factors for an ectopic pregnancy at that time. The left fallopian tube looked normal at the time of the laparoscopy.
However six days later the patient presented as an emergency with acute left sided abdomino-pelvic pain and generally feeling unwell. She had no vaginal bleeding. On examination she was cold, clammy and hypotensive. Abdominal examination was suggestive of an acute abdomen with severe tenderness, guarding and rigidity. Clinical differential diagnosis at that stage was a possible bleed from the corpus luteal cyst which was seen in the initial scan or an ectopic pregnancy.
She was counseled and consented for an operative laparoscopy and ERPC (evacuation of retained products of conception).
The patient made an unremarkable recovery from the surgery and was discharged the following day. Both the tissue specimens were sent separately and the histology from each of the specimens confirmed chorionic villi suggestive of a heterotopic pregnancy.
Heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the presence of multiple gestations, with one being in the uterine cavity and the other outside the uterus commonly in the fallopian tube and uncommonly in the cervix or ovary [1–3]. Spontaneous triplet heterotopic pregnancy has also been reported with two yolk sacs seen in one tube , and in another case an ectopic pregnancy in each tube with a single intrauterine gestation .
Heterotopic pregnancies are becoming more common following assisted conception techniques for subfertility , however spontaneous heterotopic pregnancies are quite rare . The incidence quoted is 1 in 30,000 pregnancies .
Heterotopic pregnancies can pose a diagnostic dilemma because an early transvaginal ultrasound may not diagnose an ex-utero gestation in all cases. A diagnosis of a pseudosac should be made with caution, as even in the presence of a pseudo sac there can be a high false positive diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy . Sometimes the presence of a haemorrhagic corpus luteum can confuse and delay the diagnosis of a heterotopic pregnancy .
The detection rate of heterotopic pregnancy can vary from 41 to 84% with transvaginal ultrasound scans [12, 13]. It is influenced by factors like routine and easy access to transvaginal ultrasound scans for high risk patients with a history of previous ectopic pregnancy and those who received fertility treatment.
With an increase in assisted conception the likelihood of detecting heterotopic pregnancy will increase but missed or delayed diagnosis of spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy remains a diagnostic dilemma and a challenge for gynaecologists. In a case series Louis-Sylvestre et al , mentioned 13 cases of heterotopic pregnancy out of which only one case was a spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy, 6 with ovulation induction and 6 with IVF. The mean gestational age at the time of the diagnosis was 8 weeks and 54% heterotopic pregnancies were detected by transvaginal ultrasound. All the patients underwent surgical treatment out of which 10 had a laparoscopy and 3 had a laparotomy mainly for significant hemoperitoneum. They found laparoscopy to be useful for the early diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy and resulted in good surgical outcomes.
The question however arises in women with spontaneous gestations who do not necessarily have early ultrasound scans. Women with previous ectopic pregnancy, tubal surgery or previous pelvic inflammatory disease may be at a higher risk and should be scanned at an early gestation to confirm the location of the pregnancy. Also a high index of suspicion is necessary in the low risk symptomatic patient with abdominal or pelvic pain in which ultrasound findings are consistent with intrauterine gestation sac while free fluid is noted in the pelvis with or without an adnexal mass.
The diagnostic role of serum beta hCG levels in heterotopic pregnancy is debatable . The normal algorithm for the rapid rise in the serum beta hCG in early pregnancy cannot be used due to the presence of the intrauterine gestation which could lead to false assurances. This can be highlighted in our case where the serum beta hCG was noted to be 21846 IU/l just before the laparoscopy was undertaken. The important learning point from our case was that the diagnosis was not suspected at the initial presentation and the patient presented subsequently with acute abdominal pain with intra peritoneal haemorrhage. The finding of an intrauterine gestational sac was a red herring and led to false assurances. In women with a previous ectopic gestation treated surgically or non surgically, increased vigilance is required even if they are asymptomatic and an intrauterine gestation is confirmed. Similarly if a patient continues to have ongoing abdominal or pelvic pain with a confirmed intrauterine pregnancy, one of the differential diagnoses should be heterotopic pregnancy.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review from the journal's Editor-in-Chief.
- Govindarajan MJ, Rajan R: Heterotopic pregnancy in natural conception. J Hum Reprod Sci. 1 (1): 37-38. 10.4103/0974-1208.39595.Google Scholar
- Hirose M, Nomura T, Wakuda K, Ishguru T, Yoshida Y: Combined intrauterine and ovary pregnancy: A case report. Asia Oceana J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994, 20: 20-25.Google Scholar
- Peleg D, Bar-Hava , Neaman-Leaven M, Ashkena , Ben-Rafaelz J: Early diagnosis and successful non surgical treatment of viable combined intrauterine and cervical pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1994, 62: 405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alsunaidi M: An unexpected spontaneous triplet heterotopic pregnancy. Saudi Med J. 2005, 26 (1): 136-138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeong H, Park I, Yoon S, Lee N, Kim H, Park S: Heterotopic triplet pregnancy with bilateral tubal and intrauterine pregnancy after spontaneous conception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 142: 161-162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raziel A, Friedler S, Herman A, Strassburger D, Maymon R, Ron-el R: Recurrent heterotopic pregnancy after repeated in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Rep. 1997, 12: 1810-1812. 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1810.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jerrad D, Tso E, Salik R, Barish RA: Unsuspected heterotopic pregnancy in a woman without risk factors. Am J Emerg Med. 1992, 10: 58-60. 10.1016/0735-6757(92)90128-K.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Voe RW, Pratt JH: Simultaneous intrauterine and extra uterine pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1948, 56: 1119-1126.Google Scholar
- Ahmed A, Tom B, Calabrese P: Ectopic pregnancy diagnosis and the pseudo-sac. Fertil Steril. 2004, 81 (5): 1225-1228. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sohail S: Haemorrhagic corpus luteum mimicking heterotopic pregnancy. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2005, 15: 180-181.Google Scholar
- Louis-Sylvestre , Morice P, Chapron C, Dubuisson : The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and management of heterotopic pregnancy. Hum Rep. 1997, 12 (5): 1100-1102. 10.1093/humrep/12.5.1100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tal J, Haddad S, Gordon N: Heterotopic pregnancy after ovulation induction and assisted reproductive technologies: a literature review from 1971 to 1993. Fertil Steril. 1996, 66: 1-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcus SF, Macnamee M, Brinsden P: Heterotopic pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Repro. 1995, 10: 1232-1236.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jibodu OA, Darne FJ: Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy presenting with tubal rupture. Hum Rep. 1997, 12 (5): 1098-1099. 10.1093/humrep/12.5.1098.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.