Open Access

Synchronous testicular liposarcoma and prostate adenocarcinoma: a case report

  • Umut Demirci1,
  • Suleyman Buyukberber1Email author,
  • Asli Cakir2,
  • Banu Ozturk1,
  • Nalan Akyurek2,
  • Basak Unver1,
  • Meltem Baykara1,
  • Mustafa Benekli1 and
  • Ugur Coskun1
Cases Journal20103:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1626-3-27

Received: 6 November 2009

Accepted: 14 January 2010

Published: 14 January 2010

Abstract

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in men. Testicular liposarcomas are uncommon soft tissue neoplasms. We report coexistence of prostate cancer and testicular liposarcoma in a 69 year-old-man because while orchiectomy endications are decreasing day by day, these second malignancies should not be missed.

Introduction

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the most common malignancy in men and also the leading cause of cancer related death. Sarcomas of the genitourinary tract account for 5% of these cases and 2% of all urological tumors. The testis is the most commonly involved urological site and accounts for approximately 30% of all genitourinary sarcomas [1].

Testicular liposarcomas are uncommon soft tissue neoplasms. Liposarcomas, account for 20-50% of sarcomas, seen in the paratesticular region [2, 3]. Preoperative diagnosis is infrequent, these tumours sometimes present in elderly adults with a palpable mass of the inguinal canal or scrotum. These tumours may arise from the spermatic cord, fatty tissue or malignant transformation of a pre-existing lipoma [4]. Three pathologic categories of liposarcoma are recognized; well differentiated, myxoid/round cell and pleomorphic. Most paratesticular liposarcomas are well differentiated [5, 6]. They frequently have a good prognosis because of their low grade of malignancy [7].

The relative rarity of adult testicular sarcomas has meant that the information used to guide treatment is based on previous experiences from various groups of few patients. Treatment options have invariably been evaluated in previous studies [8, 9]. It has a high rate of survival over 5 years [10].

Case presentation

In 2005; during a 69-year-old Asian origin Turkish man's routine controls, elevated prostate spesific antigen (PSA) levels was determined. His prostate biopsy appointed as adenocarcinoma with a score of Gleason 2+3 (Figure 1). He has type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension. There was no attribute in his family story and systemic investigation. An abdominal CT scan evaluated prostate's dimensions as 47 × 37 × 33 mm and no additional pathological evidance was determined. In bone scan imaging, increased uptake of right tenth rib and left seventh rib were interpreted as malignancy. It was accepted as stage IV prostate carcinoma and radical orchiectomy was applied. In its microscopic investigation where left testis was normal, low grade liposarcoma was appointed in right testis (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Acinar type prostate adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 2+3.

Figure 2

Atypic lypoblasts, propelled to edge nucleusus with vesicular and notched cytoplasm (HE ×40).

In computed tomography scan of chest, no positive finding was determined. Radiation theraphy with 70 Gy was employed to prostate between July-September 2006. Because of obtaining synchroneous liposarcoma, adjuvant systemic therapy was given as four cure of IMA (Adriamycin (60 mg/m2) 1st, İfosfamide (2.5 g/m2) 1st, 2nd, 3rd, Mesna (2.5 g/m2) 1st, 2nd, 3rd days of every 21 day) in October-December 2006. In September 2008, his PSA and fPSA levels were <0.002 and no differentiation was determined in bone scan imaging.

Discussion

In recent years, hormone therapy (ADT) has been more choosen than surgical treatment for hormonal deprivation. Like our case; the second and important malignencies could be missed. While orchiectomy endications are decreasing day by day, these second malignancies should not be missed. Our purposes in this case are to show the coexistence of prostate cancer and rare testicular neoplasm ‘liposarcoma’ and evaluate the treatment with literature.

The current guidelines recommends castration alone with either an orchiectomy or LHRH agonists. Patients with widely advanced and metastatic prostate cancer were previously treated with bilateral orchiectomy. Since the introduction of LHRH agonist therapy, surgical intervention has been practiced less often [11]. In our case if medical hormonal therapy was chosen, the diagnose of liposarcoma would be determined later.

A recent meta-analysis included 22 trials with 5710 advanced prostate cancer patients, applied both medical castration and bilateral orchiectomy or one of them alone. Statistically no significant survival advantage was found with combined androgen blockage [12]. Although ADT is associated with high responses, its curative potential is limited and unfortunately nearly all patients develop resistance to hormonal therapy. In a study, 938 locally advanced or asymptomatic metastatic prostate cancer patients received treatment with orchiectomy or LHRH agonist either immediately or after symptoms occurred. Development of disease releated event was twice as common in the deferred-treatment group [13].

Testicular liposarcomas are uncommon cases in the literature. Its coexistence with another malignancy is rare. Although prostate cancer patients have higher risk of a second cancer than general population. The most frequently observed second malignancies in prostate cancer patients include carcinomas of the bladder, stomach, colon and lesser cutaneous and hematolymphoid malignancies The cause of death was always from the second neoplasia [1416]. In 312 prostate cancer patients, 60 multiple malignant neoplasms (MMNs) was diagnosed. In 13 of them, prostate cancer and other malignancies were diagnosed simultaneously [17]. Another study with 392 patients who were treated for urologic cancers, 42 cases diagnosed with MMNs and only 16 patients (35%) had synchronous MMNs. The incidence of prostatic cancer was higher than other single MMNs associated with genitourinary organs. In this study, the incidence of MMNs with genitourinary cancer was as high as 10.6% and the prognosis of these patients was poor [18]. In 397 patients with urinary system tumors, second malignancy were determined in 29 patients (6.6%) and 21 of them had urological malignancy with the incidence of 6.1%. Another current study follows up with 983 patients who were diagnosed as prostate cancer and whom 106 (11.5%) developed a MMN for sixteen years. Uriary bladder cancer and malignant lymphoma occured in these patients [19].

In our case because liposarcoma was determined after radical orchiectomy, we decided the treatment choice as radiotherapy and four cycles of IMA as a chemotherapy regiment. The optimum local and systemic treatment for these tumours remains controversial, but there is a general consensus that all testicular sarcomas in adults should be managed with radical orchiectomy. Adjuvant locoregional radiation and/or chemotherapy apparently diminishes the risk of local relaps [8, 9, 20].

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University Medical Faculty
(2)
Department of Pathology, Gazi University Medical Faculty

References

  1. Frank I, Takahashi S, Tsukamoto T, Lieber MM: Genitourinary sarcomas and carcinosarcomas in adults. Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology. Edited by: Vogelzang NJ, Shipley WU, Scardino PT, Coffey DS. 2000, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1110-1113. 2Google Scholar
  2. Khoubehi B, Mishra V, Ali M, Motiwala H, Karim O: Adult paratesticular tumours. BJU International. 2002, 90: 707-715. 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02992.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman J, Brennan MF, Alektiar K, Russo P: Adult Spermatic Cord Sarcomas: Management and Results. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10: 669-675. 10.1245/ASO.2003.11.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Torosian MH, Wein AJ: Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord. Case report and review of literature. J Surg Oncol. 1987, 34: 179-181. 10.1002/jso.2930340310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mentzel T, Fletcher CD: Lipomatous tumours of soft tissues: an update. Virchows Arch. 1995, 427: 353-363. 10.1007/BF00199383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dei Tos AP, Dal Cin P: The role of cytogenetics in classification of soft tissue tumours. Virchows Arch. 1997, 431: 83-94. 10.1007/s004280050073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewis JJ, Leung D, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF: Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: analysis of 500 patients treated and followed at a single institution. Ann Surg. 1998, 228: 355-365. 10.1097/00000658-199809000-00008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Catton CN, Cummings BJ, Fornasier V, O'Sullivan B, Quirt I, Warr D: Adult paratesticular sarcomas. A review of 21 cases. J Urol. 1991, 146: 342-345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Catton CN, Jewett M, O'Sullivan I, Kandel R: Paratesticular sarcoma: Failure pattern after definitive local therapy. J Urol. 1999, 161: 1844-1847. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68823-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Soler Soler JL, Zuluaga Gomez A, Hidalgo Domínguez MR, Bados Nieto MP, Martinez Torres JL, de la Fuente Serrano A, Nogueras Ocana M: Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: a report of a new case and review of the literature. Actas Urol Esp. 1999, 23: 447-454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Basch EM, Somerfield MR, Beer TM, Carducci MA, Higano CS, Hussain MH, Scher HI: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guideline on nonhormonal therapy for men with metastatic hormone-refractory (castration-resistant) prostate cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 5313-5318. 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Prostate Cancer Trialists: Collaborative Group. Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2000, 355: 1491-1498. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02163-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Medical Research Council Prostate Cancer Working Party Investigators Group: Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostatic cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council Trial. Br J Urol. 1997, 79: 235-246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Pawlish KS, Schottenfeld D, Severson R, Montie JE: Risk of multiple primary cancers in prostate cancer patients in the Detroit metropolitan area: a retrospective cohort study. Prostate. 1997, 33: 75-86. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19971001)33:2<75::AID-PROS1>3.0.CO;2-L.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Boorjian S, Cowan JE, Konety BR, DuChane J, Tewari A, Carroll PR, Kane CJ: Bladder Cancer Incidence and Risk Factors in Men With Prostate Cancer: Results From Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor. J Urol. 2007, 177: 883-887. 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kellen E, Zeegers MP, Dirx M, Houterman S, Droste J, Lawrence G, Truyers C, Bruckers L, Molenberghs G, Joniau S, Buntinx F: Occurrence of both bladder and prostate cancer in five cancer registries in Belgium, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Eur J Cancer. 2007, 43: 1694-1700. 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.04.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawakami S, Fukui I, Yonese J, Ueda T, Ohno Y, Tsuzuki M, Kawai T: Multiple primary malignant neoplasms associated with prostate cancer in 312 consecutive cases. Urol Int. 1997, 59: 243-247. 10.1159/000283072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fukagai T, Ishihara M, Funabashi K, Naitoh Y, Maruyama K: Multiple primary malignant neoplasms associated with genitourinary cancer. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1996, 42: 181-185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sugiyama T, Park YC, Iguchi M, Kurita T, Kiyo Hinyokika: Double cancer in urology. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1984, 30: 1427-1431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fagundes MA, Zietman AL, Althausen AF, Coen J, Shipley WU: The management of spermatic cord sarcoma. Cancer. 1996, 77: 1873-1187. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960501)77:9<1873::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Demirci et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement