- Case Report
- Open Access
The treatment of talar body fractures with compression screws: a case series
© licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 26 January 2009
- Accepted: 8 May 2009
- Published: 10 June 2009
Fractures of talar body are rare and serious injuries and frequently seen in multiply injured and polytraumatised patients. The high variability of talar fractures, their relatively low incidence together with the high percentage of concomitant injuries makes treatment of these injuries a challenge to the surgeon.
We treated three patients with talus body fracture and multiple articular fractures of the distal tibia. The patients were male, aged 36, 34 and 40 years. All cases were treated by open reduction and internal fixation. All the fractures were united during an average follow-up of 13 months and there were neither non-union nor collapses due to avascular necrosis.
- Internal Fixation
- Avascular Necrosis
- Medial Malleolus
- Body Fracture
- Talar Dome
Talar body fractures occur uncommonly, accounting for 7% to 38% of all fractures of the talus [1, 2]. The treatment of talar body fractures remains poorly defined in the literature -. Sneppen et al. reported the early results for patients with fractures of the talar body, most of them had been treated non-operatively . High rates of malunion, osteonecrosis, and arthritis were noted. There have been isolated reports of operative treatment -[4, 8]-. The clinical outcome after talar body fractures is determined by the severity of the injury and the quality of reduction and internal fixation. However, the outcome after operative treatment remains poorly understood. The timing of definite internal fixation does not appear to affect the final result [15, 16]. The incidence of avascular necrosis is almost certainly dictated by the fracture pattern and its disruption of the intrinsic blood supply to the talus . The revascularisation process can be achieved by stable surgical reduction and internal fixation [5, 11, 14]. Thus, the importance of surgical reconstruction in displaced fractures is not only to anatomically reduce the articular surfaces and restore the dimensions of the talar body, but also to ensure that the remaining precarious blood supply to the talus is not iatrogenically reduced further [1, 11, 17, 18].
Preoperative planning of definite internal fixation requires CT scanning. To obtain a complete intraoperative overview allowing for anatomical reconstruction of the articular surfaces and the axial deviation bilateral approaches are usually necessary. Internal fixation is achieved with screws or mini-plates supplemented by temporary K-wire transfixation in cases of marked additional ligamentous instability [18, 19].
This combined injury pattern seems to be very rare; a few reports of a talar body fracture combined with ankle malleolar fractures found in the literature.
The aim of the present study was to characterize these fractures, to describe to our limited experiences about surgical treatment approach, and to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes.
Case report 1
A 36-year-old male Caucasian patient who had fallen down from the third storey of a construction was admitted to the emergency room. He had swelling and haematoma over the both ankles.
Case report 2
Case report 3
Talar body fractures are extremely rarer still. The body of the talus articulates with tibia, fibula and the calcaneus. Complexity in the blood supply to the talus itself makes it one of the bones in the body vulnerable to avascular necrosis . Arthritis in the ankle and subtalar joints can occur in the absence of avascular necrosis of the talus and joint incongruity [6, 16].
The reported incidence of avascular necrosis for severely comminuted talar body fracture is around 50%-75% [5, 10, 12, 20]-. Vallier et al. reporting on radiographic findings of 26 talar body fractures with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, noted a 38% incidence of AVN, 65% incidence of post-traumatic tibiotalar arthritis and 34% incidence of posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. Worse outcomes were noted in association with comminuted fractures, associated talar neck fractures and open fractures . Lindvall et al., in 2004, reported on 26 isolated cases of talar neck and body fractures with a minimum follow-up of 48 months and found a 50% incidence of AVN and 100% incidence of post-traumatic arthritis. Timing of fixation did not seem to affect the outcome, union or prevalence of AVN in the later study .
The appearance of a radiolucent zone 4-8 weeks after the injury at the subcortical bone of the talar dome indicating bone remodelling "Hawkins' sign" is highly predictive of a revitalisation of the talar body after a fracture. We had not seen AVN in our patients. All cases with a positive Hawkins sign. Thirteen months (mean follow-up period) after the initial injury, our patient made full recovery with no evidence of avascular necrosis or collapse radiologically and clinically. The reason for not seeing avascular necrosis, however, could be our short follow-up period. The mild osteo-arthritic changes seen at the 3 years follow-up are expected in our patient, since the incidence of degenerative changes after talar body fractures is high, affecting more often the tibiotalar than the subtalar joint.
Talar body fractures are produced by an axial compression of the talus between the tibial plafond and calcaneus [6, 12]. In cases with a combined medial malleolar fracture, an additional inversion torque seems to distribute this force to the medial structures, producing a vertical split of the talar body and the medial malleolar fracture . A lateral side talar body fracture could be produced by pronation-external rotation . Recently, Frawley et al. showed in their series of 26 talar fracture patients, 15 talar fractures in the right feet, which push brake pedals, in 16 car drivers . Fractures in the neck and the lateral process of the talus were believed to occur when both the foot and ankle are hyperdorsiflexed . The fracture pattern in our cases suggests an inversion, axial loading, and external rotation mechanism.
In our patients, open reduction and internal fixation was performed with the use of 4.5 mm AO cannulated or headless cannulated (acutrak®, Acumed) screws. We performed surgery through three different (single) approach individually (case1, anteromedial; case 2, anterolateral; case 3, anterior approach). The screws are introduced into the posterior part of the talar body in order to achieve maximum purchase. On the other hand, additional screw was inserted percutaneously. Because posteroanterior screw position gave more stability in a biomechanical trial .
Open reduction and internal fixation may restore the joint congruity allowing early range of movement in the tibio-talar and subtalar joints. Plaster cast application was not used and range of motion exercise was encouraged at the early post-operative period but full weight bearing was allowed at 12 weeks .
Fractures of the talar body are often severe injuries. Conservative treatment with closed reduction and casting leads to a very high rate of complications. Hence, open reduction and internal fixation in the appropriately selected patient can be performed safely with the prospect of reducing complications. An accurate reduction and stable fixation are also mandatory in order to provide the best biomechanical environment for revascularization of the lateral part of the talar body. Early treatment with open reduction and stable internal fixation, using minimal invasive technique, may improve the final outcome.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Higgins TF, Baumgaertner MR: Diagnosis and treatment of fractures of the talus: a comprehensive review of the literature. Foot Ankle Int. 1999, 20: 595-605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ebraheim NA, Patil V, Owens C, Kandimalla Y: Clinical outcome of fractures of the talar body. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 10.1007/s00264-007-0399-5.Google Scholar
- Canale ST, Kelly FB: Fractures of the neck of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978, 60: 143-156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallier HA, Nork SE, Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ: Surgical treatment of talar body fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85: 1716-1724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rammelt S, Zwipp H: Talar neck and body fractures Injury. Int J Care Injured. 2009, 40: 120-135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thordarson DB: Talar body fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001, 32: 65-77. 10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70194-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sneppen O, Christensen SB, Krogsoe O, et al: Fracture of the body of the Talus. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977, 48: 317-324. 10.3109/17453677708988775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Devalia KL, Ismaiel AH, Joseph G, Jesry MG: Fourteen years follow up of an unclassified talar body fracture with review of literature. Foot Ankle Surg. 2006, 12: 85-88. 10.1016/j.fas.2006.01.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Isefuku S, Hatori M: Talar fractures associated with ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures: report of three cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005, 125: 142-144. 10.1007/s00402-004-0783-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindvall E, Haidukewych G, Di Pasquale T, Herscovici D, Sanders R: Open reduction and stable fixation of isolated, displaced talar neck and body fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86: 2229-2234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morgan G, Ramaswamy R, Frost B, Hariharan K: Talar body fractures: A case report of successful surgical management and review of the literature. Injury Extra. 2007, 38: 39-42. 10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verettas DAJ, Ververidis A, Drosos GI, Chatzipapas CN, Kazakos KI: Talar body fracture combined with bimalleolar fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008, 128: 731-734. 10.1007/s00402-007-0475-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elgafy H, Ebraheim NA, Tile M, et al: Fractures of the talus: experience of two level 1 trauma centers. Foot Ankle Int. 2000, 21: 1023-1029.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mendonca AD, Maury AC, Makwana NK: Case report: A simultaneous fracture of the tibia and talar body. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2004, 10: 45-47. 10.1016/S1268-7731(03)00109-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inokuchi S, Ogawa K, Usami N: Classification of fractures of the talus: clear differentiation between neck and body fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 1996, 17: 748-750.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marti R: Die Frakturenbehandlung bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Edited by: Weber BG Brunner C Freuler F. 1974, Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
- Haliburton RA, Sullivan CR, Kelly PJ, Peterson LF: The extra-osseous and intra-osseous blood supply of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958, 40: 1115-1120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulze W, Richter J, Russe O, et al: Surgical treatment of talus fractures: a retrospective study of 80 cases followed for 1-15 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002, 73: 344-351. 10.1080/000164702320155374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swanson TV, Bray TJ, Holmes GB: Fractures of the talar neck. A mechanical study of fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992, 74: 544-551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fortin PT, Balazsy JE: Talus fractures: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001, 9: 114-127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawkins LG: Fractures of the neck of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970, 52: 991-1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tezval M, Dumont C, Sturmer KM: Prognostic reliability of the Hawkins sign in fractures of the talus. J Orthop Trauma. 2007, 21: 538-543. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318148c665.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frawley PA, Hart JA, Young DA: Treatment outcome of major fractures of the talus. Foot Ankle Int. 1995, 16: 339-345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.