Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

Cases Journal

Open Access

Paradoxical myopic shift following cycloplegia in retinopathy of prematurity patients: a case series

Cases Journal20092:8970

https://doi.org/10.4076/1757-1626-2-8970

Received: 6 January 2009

Accepted: 11 August 2009

Published: 25 August 2009

Abstract

Introduction

Spectacle non-compliance is a significant problem in pediatric patients, and may have a variety of consequences. Non-compliance with myopic refractive correction could be secondary to a variety of issues, including age, discomfort, gender, urban vs. rural residence, presenting visual acuity, and degree of refractive error. We observed a phenomenon in our pediatric patients with retinopathy of prematurity that may add another possible explanation: incorrect prescription due to measures of increased, rather than decreased, myopia after cycloplegia.

Case presentation

An unmasked, prospective study of 8 consecutive patients seen in a single practice. Retinoscopic refraction measurements were obtained before and after pharmacologic cycloplegia.

In all 13 eyes, there was either no change (2 eyes) or a myopic shift (11 eyes) in the measured refractive error. The average change in refraction was -1.58 and -1.54 for the right and left eyes, respectively (range 0 to -3.00 OD and 0 to -3.00 OS).

Conclusions

The contribution of ocular components to refractive status differs between ROP and non-ROP eyes. Unanticipated myopic shift following cycloplegia in ROP patients may result in inappropriate glasses prescription with poor correction of visual acuity. This may contribute to spectacle noncompliance in this group.

Introduction

Spectacle non-compliance is occasionally encountered in pediatric patients [1, 2], even though refractive errors may have significant functional, economic, medical, and educational consequences. Non-compliance with myopic refractive correction could be secondary to a variety of issues, including age, discomfort, gender, urban vs. rural residence, presenting visual acuity, and degree of refractive error [2, 3]. In pediatric patients with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), we found increased rather than decreased myopia after cycloplegia. This finding may be of interest to ophthalmologists who care for children with resolved, advanced ROP.

Case presentation

Methods

Ethics committee approval was obtained from the Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute. We collected our data in a prospective, but unmasked fashion. The cases were accumulated from 8 consecutive ROP patients seen by one author (WVG) in his office, with no others left out (Table 1). Informed consent for participation was obtained for each patient from the patients' parents. None of these children participated in the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study. The patients ranged in age from 8 months to 7 years, with an average age of 41 months. For each patient, manifest and cycloplegic refractions were measured in both eyes, and the difference between the two measurements was determined. Cycloplegia was accomplished with tropicamide 1%. Measurements were obtained using a retinoscope (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA) from 13 of 16 eyes, limited in 3 eyes by stage 5 disease.
Table 1

Summary of data for all patients indicating age and manifest (MRx) and cycloplegic (CRx) refractive error measurements in right and left eyes

Patient #

Age

MRx OD

MRx OS

CRx OD

CRx OS

1

4 years

-5.25

-4.00

-6.25

-4.50

2

8 months

1.50

1.25

-1.50

-1.75

3

6 years

-8.75

stage 5

-9.50

stage 5

4

16 months

-1.75

-1.75

-4.00

-4.00

5

7 years

stage 5

-7.50

stage 5

-7.50

6

3 years

stage 5

-19.00

stage 5

-22.00

7

3 years

-7.50

-4.50

-8.00

-5.00

8

2 years

-8.50

-7.50

-10.50

-9.00

MRx, manifest refraction; CRx, cycloplegic refraction; OD, right eye; OD, left eye.

Results

In all 13 eyes, there was either no change (2 eyes) or a myopic shift (11 eyes) in the measured refractive error. The average change in refraction was -1.58 and -1.54 for the right and left eyes, respectively (range 0 to -3.00 OD and 0 to -3.00 OS).

Discussion

Cycloplegic refraction should provide the most hyperopic refraction possible for an individual, because cycloplegic agents paralyze muscles involved in accommodation. Studies on the effect of cycloplegia have not evaluated children who recovered from advanced ROP, however.

The shift toward myopia after cycloplegia in children who had advanced ROP can be explained by a difference in the contribution of ocular components to refractive status differs between ROP and non-ROP eyes. In patients without ROP, the refractive state of the eye is most strongly correlated with the axial length of the eye, less so with corneal curvature or anterior chamber depth, and not correlated with the power of the lens [4, 5]. In children with a history of advanced ROP, axial length does not change much, and myopia is primarily lenticular in etiology [6, 7]. The lens edge is more refractive than its center, and the lens may be more spherical and anteriorized, due to peripheral ROP retinal cicatricial changes. Lenticular myopia is noted even in normal adult eyes in dim lighting and after cycloplegia [8]-[10].

Following recovery from ROP, it is likely that the affected eye has a new constellation of factors that contribute to refractive status. This study looks at cases of myopia after cycloplegia, and is not controlled. Nevertheless, attention should be given to the manifest refraction in infants who had advanced ROP. In some instances, paradoxical myopia could explain spectacle non-compliance. This study has several limitations. Scientific rigor is limited in uncontrolled case series. Also we have a relatively small cohort of eight patients. Moreover, we have no evidence to support our assertion that an incorrect spectacle prescription is associated with non-compliance. However, this phenomenon has not been reported previously, and should be considered when measuring glasses ROP patients.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for publication of this case series. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Pacific Vision Foundation for assistance in funding this study. Dr. Good is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute EY015228.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center
(2)
Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
(3)
Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Children's Hospital

References

  1. Preslan MW, Novak A: Baltimore Vision Screening Project. Phase 2. Ophthalmology. 1998, 105: 150-153. 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91813-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Horwood AM: Compliance with first time spectacle wear in children under eight years of age. Eye. 1998, 12: 173-178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Castanon Holguin AM, Congdon N, Patel N, Ratcliffe A, Esteso P, Toledo Flores S, Gilbert D, Pereyra Rito MA, Munoz B: Factors associated with spectacle-wear compliance in school-aged Mexican children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006, 47: 925-928. 10.1167/iovs.05-0895.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Burr D, Moeschberger M: Normal eye growth in emmetropic schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci. 2004, 81: 819-828. 10.1097/01.OPX.0000145028.53923.67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Friedman NE, Adams AJ: Initial cross-sectional results from the Orinda Longitudinal Study of Myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 1993, 70: 750-758. 10.1097/00006324-199309000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Garcia-Valenzuela E, Kaufman LM: High myopia associated with retinopathy of prematurity is primarily lenticular. J Aapos. 2005, 9: 121-128. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordon RA, Donzis PB: Myopia associated with retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology. 1986, 93: 1593-1598.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang Y, Zhao K, Jin Y, Niu Y, Zuo T: Changes of higher order aberration with various pupil sizes in the myopic eye. J Refract Surg. 2003, 19 (2): S270-S274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Toh T, Kearns LS, Scotter LW, Mackey DA: Post-cycloplegia myopic shift in an older population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005, 12: 215-219. 10.1080/09286580590964784.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carkeet A, Velaedan S, Tan YK, Lee DY, Tan DT: Higher order ocular aberrations after cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic pupil dilation. J Refract Surg. 2003, 19: 316-322.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement